The Ford GN34: The Mid Engine Supercar Ford Cancelled at the Last Second

Updated  
Ford GN34 mid engine prototype in a studio setting, representing the cancelled supercar project
JOIN THE HEADCOUNT COFFEE COMMUNITY

In the late 1980s, Ford quietly began developing what could have been one of the most significant American supercars of its era, a mid engine performance machine designed to challenge Ferrari, Porsche, and the rising Japanese sports car wave. Known internally as the GN34, the project involved global engineering partnerships, advanced aerodynamics, and a production strategy bold enough to shift Ford’s performance image for an entire generation. Yet after years of prototypes, testing, and planning, the GN34 was cancelled abruptly, just as it was approaching the final stages of approval. What survived were scattered photographs, engineering notes, and the lingering question of how different Ford’s performance lineage might look had the car reached the road.

The story began in 1984 when Ford sought a vehicle that could elevate the brand’s global performance credibility. The GN34, short for Global North America Project 34, was envisioned as a compact supercar positioned above the Mustang but below exotic European competitors. Instead of building the car solely in house, Ford planned to use an international network. Yamaha, who had already partnered with Ford on high revving engines, was contracted to build a sophisticated DOHC V6. Giugiaro’s Italdesign was brought in for styling proposals. Ford engineers in Dearborn worked on chassis development, while teams from Europe contributed suspension and handling expertise.

The centerpiece of the GN34 was its mid engine layout, a radical departure from Ford’s lineup at the time. The Yamaha developed 3.0 liter V6 promised smooth high rpm power, and early testing suggested the car would be quick enough to rival the Acura NSX, which was still years away. Ford evaluated several prototype bodies, including the 1986 Ford Maya II ES concept from Italdesign, which closely matched the proportions and aerodynamic direction the GN34 would eventually take. Other test mules used the space framed Panther platform or heavily modified existing Ford components to evaluate engine placement and weight distribution.

By 1987 the GN34 was progressing steadily. Ford executives envisioned the car as a technological showcase that would sit at the top of their performance hierarchy. The timing seemed perfect. Japan’s supercar ambitions were growing, and GM and Chrysler had ongoing experiments with mid engine concepts. The GN34 could place Ford ahead of that curve. Prototypes were built and tested. Suppliers lined up. Budgets were shaped. The business case was challenging but still intact. What Ford needed was a green light.

Then the landscape changed dramatically. When the Acura NSX was unveiled in 1989, its aluminum construction, refinement, and Honda backed reliability standards shocked the industry. Ford executives reevaluated their own project immediately. The GN34 was promising, but it was not built with an all aluminum chassis, and its price point was far lower than the NSX. Matching the Acura’s sophistication would require a massive increase in development cost. Beating it outright would demand even more.

At the same time, Ford leadership began shifting priorities. The company was expanding its Taurus and Explorer success, investing in global platforms, and responding to economic uncertainties that made niche halo cars look less appealing. A mid engine supercar, particularly one not guaranteed to outperform the NSX, seemed increasingly risky. Cost analysts raised concerns. Marketing teams questioned demand. Engineers continued to refine the prototypes, but momentum was fading.

By late 1989 the decision was made. Ford cancelled the GN34, ending nearly five years of development. Some of the technology, including the Yamaha V6, survived within the Ford lineup. It eventually powered the Taurus SHO, one of the most beloved sleeper sedans of the 1990s. Ford reused design work as well, elements of the GN34 shaping the 1989 Mazda MX 03 concept and influencing future mid engine experiments inside the company.

For enthusiasts, the GN34 has become one of the great what if stories in American automotive history. Had it reached production, Ford would have entered the supercar market years before the 2005 GT revival. The GN34 might have rewritten Ford’s performance identity during a pivotal era, proving the company could build a world class mid engine machine and compete directly with rising Japanese performance brands.

Instead, the GN34 remains a ghost of what might have been, a secretive supercar program that came remarkably close to reality before being halted by market shifts and competitive pressure. Its prototypes offer a glimpse into an alternate automotive timeline, one where Ford challenged the NSX on its own turf and reshaped the company’s performance future from the inside out.


Sources & Further Reading:
– Ford Motor Company design archives and GN34 project documentation.
– Yamaha engineering notes related to Ford’s 3.0 liter DOHC V6 program.
– Italdesign records on the Maya II and GN34 associated styling proposals.
– Road & Track and Car and Driver coverage of the GN34 and Ford’s late 1980s performance strategy.
– Interviews with former Ford engineers involved in mid engine prototype development.

(One of many stories shared by Headcount Coffee, where mystery, history, and late night reading meet.)

Ready for your next bag of coffee?

Discover organic, small-batch coffee from Headcount Coffee, freshly roasted in our Texas roastery and shipped fast so your next brew actually tastes fresh.

→ Shop Headcount Coffee

A Headcount Media publication.